4.6 Article

Blood culture bottle culture of pleural fluid in pleural infection

期刊

THORAX
卷 66, 期 8, 页码 658-662

出版社

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/thx.2010.157842

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  2. Medical Research Council [G1001128, G0600475] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2009-13-006] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G1001128, G0600475] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Pleural infection is common, and has a >30% major morbidity and mortality-particularly when infection is caused by Gram-negative, Staphylococcus aureus or mixed aerobic pathogens. Standard pleural fluid culture is negative in similar to 40% of cases. Culturing pleural fluid in blood culture bottles may increase microbial yield, and is cheap and easy to perform. Objectives To determine whether inoculating pleural fluid into blood culture bottles increases the culture positivity of pleural infection over standard laboratory culture, and to assess the optimum volume of inoculum to introduce. Methods 62 patients with pleural infection were enrolled. Pairs of aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles were inoculated at the bedside with 2, 5 or 10 ml of pleural fluid, and two pleural fluid specimens were sent for standard culture. Pleural fluid from nine control patients was cultured to test for 'false-positive' results. Results The addition of blood culture bottle culture to standard culture increased the proportion of patients with identifiable pathogens by 20.8% (20/53 (37.7%) to 31/53 (58.5%) (difference 20.8%, 95% CI difference 8.9% to 20.8%, p < 0.001)). The second standard culture did not similarly improve the culture positivity (19/49 (38.8%) to 22/49 (44.9%) (difference 6.1%, 95% CI difference -2.5% to 6.1%, p = 0.08)). The culture inoculum volume did not influence bacterial isolation frequency. The control fluids were culture negative. Conclusions Blood culture bottle culture of infected pleural fluid increases microbial yield when used in addition to standard culture. This technique should be part of routine care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据