4.6 Review

Transepithelial exit of leucocytes: inflicting, reflecting or resolving airway inflammation?

期刊

THORAX
卷 65, 期 12, 页码 1111-1115

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/thx.2009.133363

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Medical Research Council
  2. Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The passage of infiltrated tissue granulocytes across airway epithelium into airway lumen is generally considered to be a pathogenic process in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). An alternative hypothesis is proposed here-namely that the transepithelial egression of infiltrated leucocytes acts to rid diseased airway tissues of proinflammatory cells efficiently and non-injuriously. Several clinical observations previously discussed as 'unexpected' and 'puzzling' support this hypothesis. In acutely resolving allergen challenge-induced inflammation, in patients with mild asthma, airway wall eosinophils disappear without evidence of apoptosis but with evidence of a developing airway lumen eosinophilia. In the same postchallenge resolution phase, lymphocytes, neutrophils and mast cells exhibit peak numbers in airway lumen of individuals with asthma. In severe asthma requiring intubation, clinical improvement is similarly parallelled by a marked increase over several days in airway lumen neutrophils. Increased numbers of sputum neutrophils and lymphocytes also occur as symptoms improve in COPD over several months after smoking cessation. Conversely, when the transepithelial exit of leucocytes has been inhibited in inflamed animal airways the inflammation in the airway wall has been much aggravated. Finally, transepithelial egression of numerous granulocytes and lymphocytes clearly can occur without any harm to airway epithelial barriers. The present hypothesis of 'resolution through egression' provides a novel interpretation of common airway lumen data, cautions against administration of agents that impede leucocyte egression in inflammatory airway diseases and infers new approaches in disease resolution research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据