4.6 Article

Relative corticosteroid insensitivity of alveolar macrophages in severe asthma compared with non-severe asthma

期刊

THORAX
卷 63, 期 9, 页码 784-790

出版社

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/thx.2007.090027

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH RO-1 [HL-69155]
  2. MRC [G0700900] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0700900, G0400503B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: About 5-10% of patients with asthma suffer from poorly controlled disease despite corticosteroid (CS) treatment, which may indicate the presence of CS insensitivity. A study was undertaken to determine whether relative CS insensitivity is present in alveolar macrophages from patients with severe asthma and its association with p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation and MAPK phosphatase-1 (MKP-1). Methods: Fibreoptic bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were performed in 20 patients with severe asthma and 19 with non-severe asthma and, for comparison, in 14 normal volunteers. Alveolar macrophages were exposed to lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 10 mu g/ml) and dexamethasone (10(-8) and 10(-6) M). Supernatants were assayed for cytokines using an ELISA-based method. p38 MAPK activity and MKP-1 messenger RNA expression were assayed in cell extracts. Results: The inhibition of LPS-induced interleukin (IL) 1 beta, IL6, IL8, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1 and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1 alpha release by dexamethasone (10(-6) M) was significantly less in macrophages from patients with severe asthma than in macrophages from patients with non-severe asthma. There was increased p38 MAPK activation in macrophages from patients with severe asthma. MKP-1 expression induced by dexamethasone and LPS, expressed as a ratio of LPS-induced expression, was reduced in severe asthma. Conclusion: Alveolar macrophages from patients with severe asthma demonstrate CS insensitivity associated with increased p38 MAPK activation that may result from impaired inducibility of MKP-1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据