4.0 Article

Emergence of clonal chromosomal alterations during the mesenchymal stromal cell cultivation

期刊

MOLECULAR CYTOGENETICS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s13039-015-0197-5

关键词

Mesenchymal stromal cells; Karyotype; Genomic integrity; Regenerative medicine

资金

  1. Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Economico e Social (BNDES)
  2. Ministerio da Ciencia e Tecnologia (MCT)
  3. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP)
  4. Ministerio da saude (MS)
  5. Secretaria de Ciencia e Tecnologia e Insumos Estrategicos (SCTIE)
  6. Departamento de Ciencia e Tecnologia (DECIT)
  7. Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq) [06/2008, AI 11/2009, 380628/2010-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Use of human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) is a promising strategy for cell therapy in injured tissues recovery. However, MSCs acquire genetic changes when cultivated in vitro that make them more susceptible to undergo neoplastic transformation. Therefore, genomic integrity of stem cells should be monitored carefully for the use in basic research and clinical trials, including karyotype analysis to confirm the absence of genetic instability. Here, we report a case of a male 67-year-old patient selected to join the study: Autologous transplantation of mesenchymal cells for treatment of severe and refractory ischemic cardiomyopathy. He underwent nephrectomy for malignant tumor on the right kidney. Cytogenetic analysis on a bone marrow sample showed a normal karyotype: 46, XY[20]. However, the MSC at second passage showed a hyperdiploid clone, with clonal trisomies of chromosomes 4, 5, 10 and X. In order to investigate more, another sample from the same patient was used for a second cultivation and, at third passage, these cells showed a clonal translocation t(9;18)(p24;q11). The recurrent aberrations in MSC may indicate the beginning of a spontaneous transformation in culture, so, these cells were not used for cell therapy. Several analyses were performed at the Center for Cell Technology (152 samples), however this was the only case to show clonal cytogenetic abnormalities. Interestingly, two distinct clonal alterations were seen in two parallel cell cultivations from the same patient, suggesting a propensity for genetic instability. This highlights the need to evaluate these cells on a case-by-case basis, especially in patients with a history of cancer. Although there is controversy about the use of cells with cytogenetic abnormality for therapy, because their tumorigenic doubtful potential, we decided against the use of these cells for regenerative medicine. Case presentation: Here, we report a case of a male 67-year-old patient selected to join the study: Autologous transplantation of mesenchymal cells for treatment of severe and refractory ischemic cardiomyopathy. He underwent nephrectomy for malignant tumor on the right kidney. Cytogenetic analysis on a bone marrow sample showed a normal karyotype: 46, XY[20]. However, the MSC at second passage showed a hyperdiploid clone, with clonal trisomies of chromosomes 4, 5, 10 and X. In order to investigate more, another sample from the same patient was used for a second cultivation and, at third passage, these cells showed a clonal translocation t(9; 18)(p24;q11). The recurrent aberrations in MSC may indicate the beginning of a spontaneous transformation in culture, so, these cells were not used for cell therapy. Several analyses were performed at the Center for Cell Technology(152 samples), however this was the only case to show clonal cytogenetic abnormalities. Interestingly, two distinct clonal alterations were seen in two parallel cell cultivations from the same patient, suggesting a propensity for genetic instability. This highlights the need to evaluate these cells on a case-by-case basis, especially in patients with a history of cancer. Conclusions: Although there is controversy about the use of cells with cytogenetic abnormality for therapy, because their tumorigenic doubtful potential, we decided against the use of these cells forregenerative medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据