4.7 Article

Vibration correlation technique for the estimation of real boundary conditions and buckling load of unstiffened plates and cylindrical shells

期刊

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 119-128

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2014.02.006

关键词

Vibration correlation technique; Buckling; Thin-walled structures; Finite element model; Cylindrical shells; Composite materials

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2008/05345-8]
  2. CNPq [303287/2009-8, 303799/2010-2]
  3. European Community [WA3-80123539]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nondestructive experimental methods to calculate the buckling load of imperfection sensitive thin-walled structures are one of the most important techniques for the validation of new structures and numerical models of large scale aerospace structures. Vibration correlation technique (VCT) allows determining equivalent boundary conditions and buckling load for several types of structures without reaching the instability point. VCT is already widely used for beam structures, but the technique is still under development for thin-walled plates and shells. This paper intends to explain the capabilities and current limitations of this technique applied to two types of structures under buckling conditions: flat plates and cylindrical shells prone to buckling. Experimental results for a flat plate and a cylindrical shell are presented together with reliable finite element models for both cases. Preliminary results showed that the VCT can be used to determine the realistic boundary conditions of a given test setup, providing valuable data for the estimation of the buckling load by finite element models. Also numerical results herein presented show that VCT can be used as a nondestructive tool to estimate the buckling load of unstiffened cylindrical shells. Experimental tests are currently under development to further validate the approach proposed herein. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据