4.7 Article

Experimental behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete filled stainless steel tube stub columns and beams

期刊

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 62-75

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2013.01.017

关键词

Recycled aggregate concrete filled stainless steel tube (RACFSST); Stub columns; Beams; Bearing capacity; Stiffness; Design code

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51121005]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT12ZD215]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering [SL2012-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) filled stainless steel tube (RACFSST) stub columns and beams under short-term loadings was experimentally studied, and a total of 28 specimens, including 14 stub columns and 14 beams, were tested. The experimental investigations were carried out on circular and square specimens with recycled aggregate replacement ratio of 0, 25%, 50% and 75%, and both recycled coarse aggregate (RCA) and recycled fine aggregate (RFA) were adopted in the tests. The main objectives of these tests were threefold: first, to describe a series of tests on new composite stub columns and beams; second, to investigate the effect of cross-section type and recycled aggregate replacement ratio on the compressive and flexural behaviour of RACFSST specimens; and finally, to evaluate the accuracy of the calculated bearing capacity, bending moment capacity and section flexural stiffness of the RACFSST specimens by using the design forrhulae in six codes related to the design of concrete filled carbon steel tube. The experimental results showed that the RACFSST stub columns and beams under short-term loadings had the stable load versus deformation responses and the good deformation-resistant ability, and the performance of core RAC was generally enhanced due to the confinement of the outer stainless steel tube. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据