4.7 Article

Impact loading of ductile rectangular plates

期刊

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
卷 50, 期 1, 页码 68-75

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2011.09.006

关键词

Rectangular plate; Square plate; Circular plate; Mass impact; Rigid-plastic analysis; Large permanent transverse displacements; Response duration; Metal plate; Simply supported; Fully clamped; Experiments; Perforation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In many industries, rigid-plastic methods of analysis are a useful design aid for safety calculations, hazard assessments, security studies and forensic investigations of ductile structures, which are subjected to large dynamic loads producing an inelastic response. This paper examines the behaviour of a rectangular plate struck at the centre by a rigid mass impact loading. A theoretical method has been developed previously for arbitrarily shaped plates which retains the influence of finite transverse displacements, or geometry changes. It is used in this paper to predict the maximum permanent transverse displacements and response duration of plates having boundary conditions characterised by a resisting moment mM(0) around the entire boundary, where m=0 and 1 give the two extreme cases of simply supported and fully clamped supports, respectively. The theoretical predictions are compared with some experimental data recorded on fully clamped metal rectangular plates having a range of aspect ratios and struck by masses travelling with low impact velocities up to nearly 7 m/s and which produce large ductile deformations without failure. The theoretical analysis gives reasonable agreement with the corresponding experimental data for masses having blunt, conical and hemispherical impact faces. For sufficiently large initial impact energies, the projectile would perforate a plate and, for completeness, a useful design equation is presented which predicts perforation energies larger than all of the test data, as expected. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据