4.4 Article

Study on target-film structural correlation in thin cobalt ferrite films grown by pulsed laser deposition technique

期刊

THIN SOLID FILMS
卷 562, 期 -, 页码 218-222

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.04.060

关键词

Cobalt ferrite; Thin films; Pulsed laser deposition; Structural properties; X-ray absorption near edge structure

资金

  1. LNLS, Campinas-SP, Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We prepared three films of crystalline cobalt ferrite under identical deposition conditions (time, temperature, pressure) using three different targets consolidated from CoFe2O4 (CFO) crystalline nanoparticles (NPs). The NPs were previously prepared by a chemical route varying their synthesis conditions in order to promote different variations in the degree of structural distortions. The purpose of this work is to study how the degree of crystal distortion of the precursor material (target) influences the structural properties of the films when they are grown by pulsed laser deposition (PLD). Fe-57 Mossbauer spectroscopy was used to study the local environment of iron atoms in the powders (targets for PLD). The Williamson-Hall plots were used to show the degree of the strain present in the films. X-ray absorption near edge structure spectra of the films, taken in grazing incidence geometry, were also carried out. The results explicitly demonstrate that the film with the largest strain was deposited using structurally more imperfect CFO powders whereas the film with the smallest strain was grown using the best powder from the structural point of view. These results were reinforced indirectly by magnetic measurements (exchange bias effect) in Fe/CFO bilayers (thin iron film was deposited additionally for this purpose) when hysteresis loops were analyzed after field cooling at a 3 T magnetic field. We show that the quality of thin cobalt ferrite films depends on the quality of the precursor material when the PLD technique is involved. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据