4.4 Review

A review of the growth of V2O5 films from 1885 to 2010

期刊

THIN SOLID FILMS
卷 519, 期 6, 页码 1761-1771

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.11.001

关键词

Vanadium oxide thin films; Electron-beam evaporation; Magnetron sputtering; Pulsed laser deposition; Chemical vapor deposition; Spray pyrolysis; Electrospinning; Sol-gel; Spin coating; Surface laser processing; Absorption edge; X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; X-ray diffraction; Bohr radius; Absorption edge

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This year is the 125th anniversary of the first synthesis of V2O5 gels. The fascinating properties and wide application range of V2O5 thin films have attracted significant attention over the past decades. Its wide optical band gap, layered structure, good chemical and thermal stability and excellent thermoelectric and electrochromic properties have made V2O5 a promising material for industrial applications such as gas sensors, electrochromic devices, optical switching devices, and reversible cathode materials for Li batteries. Gels were the first form in which V2O5 was synthesized at the end of the 19th century. Interest started to grow in the 1980s due to the discovery of their semiconducting properties and their use in antistatic coatings in the photographic industry. The rapid development of the sol-gel process brought new interest in V2O5 gels. Following a short discussion of vanadium oxides and V2O5, I summarize all thin film preparation techniques known up to now and use reported optical band gaps to characterize different growth methods. An estimation of the Bohr radius for V2O5 is also presented. This article provides an up-to-date review of more than a century (1885-2010) of research on the growth of vanadium oxide thin films. Nonetheless, due to the huge number of publications in the field, only those are selected and described which, according to the author, contribute the most to the field's further development. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据