4.4 Article

Zinc phthalocyanine - Influence of substrate temperature, film thickness, and kind of substrate on the morphology

期刊

THIN SOLID FILMS
卷 519, 期 11, 页码 3939-3945

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.01.356

关键词

Phthalocyanine; Crystallinity; X-ray diffraction; Morphology; Organic solar cells; Organic semiconductor

资金

  1. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) [13N9872]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc phthalocyanine (ZnPc), C32F11N8Zn, is a planar organic molecule having numerous optical and electrical applications in organic electronics. This work investigates the influence of various deposition parameters on the morphology of vapour thermal evaporated ZnPc films. For this purpose, ZnPc is deposited at different substrate temperatures up to 90 degrees C and film thickness up to 50 nm onto various substrates. The morphology of this ZnPc layers is characterised by X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray reflectivity (XRR) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) methods. XRD measurements show that all ZnPc films are crystalline in a triclinic (alpha-ZnPc) or monoclinic (gamma-ZnPc) phase, independent from the kind of substrate, layer thickness, or substrate temperature. The ZnPc powder, the starting product for the thermally evaporated ZnPc films, is present in the stable monoclinic beta-phase. Thus, the stacking of the ZnPc molecules changes completely during deposition. The crystallite size perpendicular to the substrate determined by XRD microstructure analysis is in the range of the layer thickness while the lateral size, obtained by AFM, is increasing with substrate temperature and film thickness. AFM and XRR show an increase of the layer roughness for thicker ZnPc layers and higher substrate temperatures during film deposition. The strain in the ZnPc films decreases for higher substrate temperatures due to enhanced thermal relaxation and for thicker ZnPc films due to lower surface tension. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据