4.4 Article

Electrochemical characterization of carbon nanotube forests grown on copper foil using transition metal catalysts

期刊

THIN SOLID FILMS
卷 520, 期 5, 页码 1651-1655

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.08.105

关键词

Carbon nanotubes; Chemical vapor deposition; Thin films; Sputtering; Double layer capacitors

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF-DMR) [0906679]
  2. NSF [0954345]
  3. Division Of Chemistry
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0954345] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Materials Research
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0906679] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growth of vertical, multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) on bulk copper foil substrates can be achieved by sputtering either Ni or Inconel thin films on Cu substrates followed by thermal chemical vapor deposition using a xylene and ferrocene mixture. During CVD growth, Fe nanoparticles from the ferrocene act as a vapor phase delivered catalyst in addition to the transition metal thin film, which breaks up into islands. Both the thin film and iron are needed for dense and uniform growth of CNTs on the copper substrates. The benefits of this relatively simple and cost effective method of directly integrating CNTs with highly conductive copper substrates are the resulting high density of nanotubes that do not require the use of additional binders and the potential for low contact resistance between the nanotubes and the substrate. This method is therefore of interest for charge storage applications such as double layer capacitors. Inconel thin films in conjunction with Fe from ferrocene appear to work better in comparison to Ni thin films in terms of CNT density and charge storage capability. We report here the power density and specific capacitance values of the double layer capacitors developed from the CNTs grown directly on copper substrates. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据