4.4 Article

Optical waveguide based on amorphous Er3+-doped Ga-Ge-Sb-S(Se) pulsed laser deposited thin films

期刊

THIN SOLID FILMS
卷 518, 期 17, 页码 4941-4947

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.03.030

关键词

Amorphous materials; Chalcogenide sulphide; Thin films; Pulsed laser deposition; Optical properties; Rare earth compounds; photoluminescence

资金

  1. French Ministry of Foreign Affairs (PHC Barrande)
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [MSM 0021627501]
  3. Czech Science Foundation [104/08/0229]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amorphous chalcogenide films play a motivating role in the development of integrated planar optical circuits due to their potential functionality in near infrared (IR) and mid-IR spectral regions. More specifically, the photoluminescence of rare earth ions in amorphous chalcogenide films can be used in laser and amplifier devices in the IR spectral domain. The aim of the present investigation was to optimize the deposition conditions for the fabrication of undoped and Er3+ doped sulphide and selenide thin films with nominal composition Ga5Ge20Sb10S(Se)(65) or Ga5Ge23Sb5S67 by pulsed laser deposition (PLD). The study of compositional, morphological and structural characteristics of the layers was realized by scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy and Raman spectroscopy analyses, respectively. Some optical properties (transmittance, index of refraction, optical band gap, etc.) of prepared chalcogenide films and optical losses were investigated as well. The clear identification of near-IR photoluminescence of Er3+ ions was obtained for both selenide and sulphide films. The decay of the I-4(13/2)-> I-4(15/2) transition at 1.54 mu m in Er3+ doped Ga5Ge20Sb10S65 PLD sulphide films was studied to assess the effects of film thickness, rare earth concentration and multilayer PLD deposition on their spectroscopic properties. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据