4.5 Article

Sintering of PLLA powders for rotational molding

期刊

THERMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 582, 期 -, 页码 59-67

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2014.03.005

关键词

Rotational molding; Biodegradable; Sintering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper is aimed to study the suitability of poly-lactic acid (PLLA) for the production of components by rotational molding. To this purpose, the sintering behavior of PLLA powders was studied by thermomechanical analysis (TMA), in order to identify the onset and endset temperatures of sintering and the onset temperatures of degradation. The results indicate that sintering of PLLA is characterized by two different steps, namely powder coalescence and void removal. The first process is fast, occurring just above the melting temperature, whereas the second one occurs at much higher temperatures. Finally, at higher temperatures, degradation involves the formation of gas in the bulk of the polymer, leading to a decrease of the bulk density. The different phenomena occurring during heating of PLLA powders were interpreted by means of dimensionless numbers. The use of such approach allowed identifying the processing window for PLLA powders, defined as the difference between the endset of sintering and the onset of degradation. In agreement with experimental results, the dimensionless analysis confirmed that wider processing windows are obtained for slower heating rates of PLLA powders. On the other hand, it is well known that potential materials for rotational molding should be characterized by an adequate toughness, essentially related to de-molding of parts. Therefore, PLLA was mixed with two different plasticizers, a non-biodegradable one, i.e. di-ethyl-hexyl-phthalate (DEHP) and a biodegradable one, i.e. poly-ethylene glycol (PEG). The plasticizers were responsible for a reduction of viscosity and therefore a faster sintering process. On the other hand, the decrease of thermal stability due to the addition of plasticizer is expected to significantly decrease the width of the processing window. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据