4.6 Article

Structural peculiarities associated with multiflagellate sperm in the emu, Dromaius novaehollandiae

期刊

THERIOGENOLOGY
卷 78, 期 5, 页码 1094-1101

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.04.018

关键词

Emu; Dromaius novaehollandiae; Spermatozoa; Multiple tails

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiflagellate sperm represent a rare defect in mammals and also in the emu where an incidence of only 1% multiflagellate sperm was recorded in semen samples from 15 birds. Biflagellate sperm were the most frequent form of the defect observed, but 3- to 5-tailed sperm were also noted. An association was apparent between multiple tails and macrocephalic sperm, which accounted for 0.6% of multiflagellate sperm. Structural features of the defect were generally similar to those seen in mammals. The duplicated tails shared a single midpiece, which housed supernumerary centriolar complexes, each surrounded by a mitochondrial sheath. A single row of mitochondria separated adjacent centriolar complexes. Elements of the connecting piece (segmented columns, capitellum) appeared normal. The nuclear base appeared flat, staggered, or scalloped depending on the number and depth of additional implantation fossae. Multiflagellate emu sperm of normal head dimensions displayed a widened nuclear base (in the form of an attenuated peripheral nuclear extension) to accommodate the attachment of the additional centriolar complexes. Defective mammalian sperm do not show this modification of the nuclear base as the inherently wider sperm head is able to accommodate the supernumerary centrioles. Although often spiraled around each other, the duplicated principal pieces of the tail were generally separated and free. However, in some cells the proximal parts were collectively bound within the plasmalemma. Multiflagellate sperm appear to have a dual origin with some defective cells originating from incomplete cytokinesis and others as a result of abnormal centriolar duplication. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据