4.6 Article

Postpartum endometrial cytology in beef cows

期刊

THERIOGENOLOGY
卷 71, 期 5, 页码 739-745

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.043

关键词

Endometrial cytology; Endometritis; Postpartum uterus; Fertility; Beef cows

资金

  1. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station federal formula [NYCV-490866]
  2. Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objectives were to characterize postpartum endometrial cytology and to determine the prevalence Of subclinical endometrial inflammation and its impact on reproduction in beef cows. Samples for endometrial cytology (low-volume uterine lavage) were obtained from 135 of 137 Angus cows (2-87 d postpartum) in northern Minnesota, 26 d before breeding started. Agreement between examiners for subjective inflammation scores was very high (kappa = 0.971); the correlation between these scores and PMN counts was high (r = 0.83; P < 0.001), validating subjective categorization. The proportion of PMN and large mononuclear cells (principally macrophages) declined with postpartum interval (P < 0.001), whereas small mononuclear cells were consistently present (and not significantly affected by postpartum interval). Pregnancy rite to fixed-time AI was 29% and overall pregnancy rate was 89%. There was no association between cell type and ultimate pregnancy status or day of conception (P > 0.10). Although inflammation later in the postpartum period apparently impaired subsequent reproduction in dairy cows, in cows > 50 d postpartum at sample collection in the present study, no cytological parameter significantly predicted final pregnancy status or day of conception. Previous twinning increased the risk of subclinical endometritis (P = 0.02), but not the probability of becoming pregnant (P = 0.14). In conclusion, we inferred that beef cows had the ability to clear uterine inflammation after resumption of ovarian cyclicity. (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据