4.6 Article

Dynamics of motile-sperm subpopulation structure in boar ejaculates subjected to in vitro capacitation and further in vitro acrosome reaction

期刊

THERIOGENOLOGY
卷 69, 期 4, 页码 501-512

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.10.021

关键词

boar sperm; motile subpopulations; capacitation; acrosome reaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Incubation of diluted boar sperm from fresh ejaculates in a previously established in vitro capacitation medium induced a significant, time-dependent increase in several mean parameters of sperm motility, such as curvilinear velocity (VCL), linear velocity (VSL), mean velocity (VAP), linearity coefficient (LIN), straightness coefficient (STR) and wobble coefficient (WOB). Furthermore, motile boar-sperm semen samples were structured in four definite subpopulations. Subpopulation I showed the lowest values of VCL, VSL and VAP and also low values of linearity. Subpopulation 2 showed the second lowest values of VCL and VAP and higher values of LIN and STR. Subpopulation 3 was characterized by high values of velocity and low values of linearity. Finally, Subpopulation 4 was characterized by high values of velocity and linearity. In vitro capacitation and further acrosome reaction induced changes in the motility characteristics of each subpopulation as well as in their percentage distribution, Subpopulations 3 and 4 being those that showed the most significant changes. However, despite these changes, the observed, overall four-subpopulation structure was firmly maintained during the entire in vitro capacitation and acrosome-reaction process. Our results suggest that capacitation-incluced motility changes are related to specific changes in the percentage of each motile-sperm subpopulation in the ejaculate without losing the overall, specific four-subpopulation structure. In this way, the maintenance of a four-subpopulation structure seems to be important in the control of the whole ejaculate physiology. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据