4.4 Article

An Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay to Study Bevacizumab Pharmacokinetics

期刊

THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 647-652

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FTD.0b013e3181ef582a

关键词

bevacizumab; enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; pharmacokinetics; therapeutic drug monitoring

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Bevacizumab is an antivascular endothelial growth factor humanized monoclonal antibody used to inhibit angiogenesis in cancer. It displays an important interindividual pharmacokinetic variability, which could explain part of the interindividual differences in clinical response. Therefore, an assay to measure bevacizumab serum concentrations is needed. Methods: An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was developed using microtiter plates sensitised with vascular endothelial growth factor(165), a recombinant form of vascular endothelial growth factor. Lower and upper limits of quantitation as well as limit of detection were determined. Eight calibrators and three quality controls, with concentrations of 5 mg/L, 30 mg/L, and 75 mg/L, were tested on five occasions initially and on five subsequent occasions. Trough and peak serum concentrations of bevacizumab were measured in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Bevacizumab concentrations were described using a two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model with first-order constants. Results: Imprecision and accuracy of calibrators and quality controls were 20% or less, except for the zero calibrator. The limit of detection was 0.033 mg/L. Lower and upper limits of quantitation were 5 and 75 mg/L, respectively. A total of 175 blood samples was available for analysis from 16 patients. Median (range) trough and peak concentrations during the treatment were 47.2 (9.6-106.9) mg/L and 159.3 (33.0-327.3) mg/L, respectively. Conclusion: This method is rapid, accurate, reproducible, and may be useful for pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies as well as in therapeutic drug monitoring of bevacizumab.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据