4.6 Article

Comparative proteomics analysis of pomegranate seeds on fruit maturation period (Punica granatum L.)

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE
卷 14, 期 12, 页码 2558-2564

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61029-2

关键词

pomegranates; soft-seeded; hard-seeded; proteomics

资金

  1. Key Project of the National Science and Technology Basic Work of China [2012 FY110100]
  2. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-ASTIP-ZFRI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seeds play a central role in the life cycle of plants. Seed hardness in pomegranates is of economic relevance, yet scarcely studied and poorly understood in China. In this study, we compared the proteomic differences between Zhongnonghong (soft-seeded) and Sanbai (hard-seeded) pomegranates. A total of 892 protein spots from both varieties were detected on two-dimensional electrophoresis gels (2-DE); 76 spots showed greater than a 1.5-fold or less than a 0.66-fold difference (P<0.05) in Zhongnonghong compared to Sanbai, of which 24 exhibited greater than a 2-fold change. Compared with Sanbai, Zhongnonghong possessed 14 up-regulated, and 10 down-regulated proteins. We identified and annotated 5 of these by using MALDI-TOF-TOF MS: pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) E1-beta family protein (spot 4609); alanine anninotransferase 2-like (ALT2L); mitochondrial glycine decarboxylase complex P-protein (spot 5803); phosphofructokinase B (PfkB)-type family of carbohydrate kinase (spot 8411); and putative dnaK-type molecular chaperone heat shock cognate protein 70 (Hsc70) (spot 9006). Of these, 3 proteins (spots 4609, 5608, 5 803) were hypothesized to play a role in the formation of seed hardness. The other two proteins (spots 8411, 9 006) were theorized to play a role in protecting the seeds from adverse stress during periods of fruit maturation. This study sets the foundation for further research on molecular mechanisms related to pomegranate seed hardness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据