4.5 Article

Effect of hepatic insulin expression on lipid metabolism in diabetic mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF DIABETES
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 314-323

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.12293

关键词

apolipoprotein C-III; forkhead box protein O1; hepatic insulin production; hypertriglyceridemia; mice; type 1 diabetes

资金

  1. American Diabetes Association
  2. Chinese Shenkang Chronic Disease Prevention Program [2012 SHDC12012303]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundHypertriglyceridemia is a common lipid disorder that is characterized by elevated plasma levels of triglyceride (TG)-rich particles, such as very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), in poorly controlled diabetes. The aim of the present study was to determine the potential therapeutic effect of hepatic insulin production on hypertriglyceridemia in mice. MethodsMice were induced diabetic and hypertriglyceridemic by streptozotocin (STZ) treatment. Using an adenovirus-mediated gene transfer approach, we delivered rat preproinsulin cDNA into the liver of diabetic mice and then determined plasma TG metabolism. To investigate the mechanism by which hepatic insulin improves TG metabolism, we determined hepatic expression of apolipoprotein C-III (ApoC-III), a structural moiety and functional inhibitor of VLDL-TG catabolism. ResultsPlasma VLDL-TG levels were markedly elevated in STZ-treated mice, and were accompanied by hyperglycemia and hypertriglyceridemia. These metabolic abnormalities were restored to near normal following hepatic insulin production in insulin vector-treated diabetic mice. In contrast, hypertriglyceridemia and hyperglycemia persisted in control vector-treated diabetic animals. Hepatic ApoC-III expression became deregulated secondary to insulin deficiency, contributing to impaired TG metabolism in diabetic mice. Hepatic insulin production suppressed excessive hepatic ApoC-III production to basal levels. ConclusionHepatic insulin production is efficacious in correcting hypertriglyceridemia associated with insulin deficiency in diabetic mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据