4.3 Article

Bayesian inference for differential equations

期刊

THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE
卷 408, 期 1, 页码 4-16

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2008.07.005

关键词

Bayesian statistics; Differential equations; Biochemical pathway models

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EPSRQ EP/E052029/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E052029/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. EPSRC [EP/E052029/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nonlinear dynamic systems such as biochemical pathways can be represented in abstract form using a number of modelling formalisms. In particular differential equations provide a highly expressive mathematical framework with which to model dynamic systems, and a very natural way to model the dynamics of a biochemical pathway in a deterministic manner is through the use of nonlinear ordinary or time delay differential equations. However if, for example, we consider a biochemical pathway the constituent chemical species and hence the pathway structure are seldom fully characterised. In addition it is often impossible to obtain values of the rates of activation or decay which form the free parameters of the mathematical model. The system model in many cases is therefore not fully characterised either in terms of structure or the values which parameters take. This uncertainty must be accounted for in a systematic manner when the model is used in simulation or predictive mode to safeguard against reaching conclusions about system characteristics that are unwarranted, or in making predictions that are unjustifiably optimistic given the uncertainty about the model. The Bayesian inferential methodology provides a coherent framework with which to characterise and propagate uncertainty in such mechanistic models and this paper provides an introduction to Bayesian methodology as applied to system models represented as differential equations. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据