4.2 Article

Computing optical rotation via an N-body approach

期刊

THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY ACCOUNTS
卷 133, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00214-014-1449-x

关键词

Many-body expansion; Optical rotation; Solvation; Response properties

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation [CHE-1058420]
  2. Multi-User Chemistry Research Instrumentation and Facility (CRIF:MU) award [CHE-0741927]
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Chemistry [1058420] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Properties of four chiral compounds-(S)-methyloxirane, (S)-methylthiirane, (S)-2-chloropropionitrile, and (M)-dimethylallene-centered in a solvation shell of six to seven water molecules have been computed using time-dependent density functional theory at several wavelengths using a many-body expansion. Interaction energies, total system dipole moments, and dynamic dipole polarizabilities converge rapidly and smoothly, exhibiting only minor oscillations with higher-body contributions. At three-body truncation of the expansion, errors in such properties as compared to the full cluster typically fall to less than 1 % (and much smaller in most cases). Specific optical rotations, however, are found to converge much more slowly and erratically, requiring five-body contributions to obtain errors less than 5 % in three of four test cases, and six-body terms for (S)-methylthiirane. The source of this behavior is found to be the wide variation of both magnitude and sign of the specific rotation with changes in the configuration of individual solute/solvent clusters. Thus, unlike simpler properties such as energies or dipole moments, where each fragment makes a small, same-sign contribution to the total property, specific rotations typically involve much larger contributions that partly cancel in the many-body expansion. Thus, the computational costs of molecular dynamics simulations of explicit solvation, for example, will be only partially alleviated by such expansions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据