4.2 Article

Density functional theory for the description of charge-transfer processes at TTF/TCNQ interfaces

期刊

THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY ACCOUNTS
卷 131, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00214-012-1273-0

关键词

DFT; Partial charge transfer; TTF/TCNQ; Organic electronics; Interface dipole; Interfaces

资金

  1. European project MINOTOR [FP7-NMP-228424]
  2. Interuniversity Attraction Pole IAP of the Belgian Federal Government [6/27]
  3. Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS/FRFC)
  4. Center for Advanced Molecular Photovoltaics [KUS-C1-015-21]
  5. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
  6. Georgia Research Alliance
  7. STC Program of the National Science Foundation [DMR-0120967]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the field of organic electronics, a central issue is to assess how the frontier electronic levels of two adjacent organic layers align with respect to one another at the interface. This alignment can be driven by the presence of a partial charge transfer and the formation of an interface dipole; it plays a key role for instance in determining the rates of exciton dissociation or exciton formation in organic solar cells or light-emitting diodes, respectively. Reliably modeling the processes taking place at these interfaces remains a challenge for the computational chemistry community. Here, we review our recent theoretical work on the influence of the choice of density functional theory (DFT) methodology on the description of the charge-transfer character in the ground state of TTF/TCNQ model complexes and interfaces. Starting with the electronic properties of the isolated TTF and TCNQ molecules and then considering the charge transfer and resulting interface dipole in TTF/TCNQ donor-acceptor stacks and bilayers, we examine the impact of the choice of DFT functional in describing the interfacial electronic structure. Finally, we employ computations based on periodic boundary conditions to highlight the impact of depolarization effects on the interfacial dipole moment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据