4.2 Article

The influence of thienyl-S,S-dioxidation on the photoluminescence and charge transport properties of dithienothiophenes: a theoretical study

期刊

THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY ACCOUNTS
卷 129, 期 2, 页码 247-255

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00214-011-0928-6

关键词

Dithienothiophene; Thienyl-S,S-dioxide; Optoelectronic property; Density functional theory

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20703008, 20903020]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT0714]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2009CB623605]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fused thiophenes have been an important class of materials due to their intriguing organic optoelectronic application. Here, comparative theoretical investigation on the fluorescence and charge transport properties of dithienothiophene compounds (1 and 2) and their dioxide derivatives (3 and 4) was carried out to shed light on the role of the thienyl-S,S-dioxide unit. The lower HOMO, LUMO energy levels, and red-shift spectra (absorption and emission) of 3 and 4 compared with 1 and 2 were attributed to the electron-withdrawing nature of the thienyl-S,S-dioxide unit. The phenomenon that fluorescence quantum yield of 4 was significantly increased through thienyl-S,S-dioxidation, compared with those of 1 and 2, was analyzed by the evaluations of the radiative decay rates and the radiationless decay rates in theory at the single molecule level and the simulation of absorption spectrum of dimer of 1. For 1, a much higher hole mobility (0.12 cm(2)/V.s) calculated by carrier hopping model than the experimental value similar to 10(-4) cm(2)/V.s was also further elucidated by molecular dynamics simulation. Furthermore, a preliminary investigation of the transport property of 3 was performed by combining the molecular dynamics simulation with dispersion-corrected B3LYP functional to provide insight into the effect of thienyl-S,S-dioxidation on the charge transport.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据