4.7 Review

Engineering plants for aphid resistance: current status and future perspectives

期刊

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS
卷 127, 期 10, 页码 2065-2083

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-014-2371-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Initiative on Development of Insect Resistance Transgenic Wheat Plants - Chinese Ministry of Agriculture [2014ZX0800201B]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [31171618, 31371702]
  3. Education Department of Henan Province [14A210004]
  4. Nanyang Normal University [70645]
  5. Chinese State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insects [SKLOF201307]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current status of development of transgenic plants for improved aphid resistance, and the pros and cons of different strategies are reviewed and future perspectives are proposed. Aphids are major agricultural pests that cause significant yield losses of crop plants each year. Excessive dependence on insecticides for aphid control is undesirable because of the development of insecticide resistance, the potential negative effects on non-target organisms and environmental pollution. Transgenic plants engineered for resistance to aphids via a non-toxic mode of action could be an efficient alternative strategy. In this review, the distribution of major aphid species and their damages on crop plants, the so far isolated aphid-resistance genes and their applications in developments of transgenic plants for improved aphid resistance, and the pros and cons of these strategies are reviewed and future perspectives are proposed. Although the transgenic plants developed through expressing aphid-resistant genes, manipulating plant secondary metabolism and plant-mediated RNAi strategy have been demonstrated to confer improved aphid resistance to some degree. So far, no aphid-resistant transgenic crop plants have ever been commercialized. This commentary is intended to be a helpful insight into the generation and future commercialization of aphid-resistant transgenic crops in a global context.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据