4.7 Article

Identification of Indica rice chromosome segments for the improvement of Japonica inbreds and hybrids

期刊

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS
卷 124, 期 7, 页码 1351-1364

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-012-1792-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. 863 Program of China [2009AA101101]
  2. 973 Program of China [2011CB100102]
  3. earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System, Jiangsu Science and Technology Development Program [BE2009301-3]
  4. PAPD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exploitation of heterosis has brought significant advance in plant breeding and agricultural production, although its genetic basis is still poorly understood. In this study, a total of 66 chromosome segment substitution (CSS) lines, derived from a cross between japonica rice inbred line Asominori (as the recurrent parent) and indica rice inbred line IR24 (as the donor parent), were used to investigate the genetic basis of heterosis in indica x japonica inter-subspecific rice hybrids. Each CSS line was crossed with the background parent Asominori, and the heterosis of F-1 hybrids was estimated by comparing the F-1 performance with its two parental lines. Field experiments were carried out across six different environments to evaluate yield and yield-related traits in the 66 CSS lines and their 66 corresponding F-1 hybrids. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analyses were conducted using a likelihood ratio test based on the stepwise regression. Thirty-six QTL were identified with significant effects in CSSL, 21 with significant effects in hybrids and 13 with significant effects in both. On the basis of average dominance degree, of all the 70 QTL affecting yield-related agronomic traits, 28.6% (20) showed an overdominance, 35.7% (25) a partial dominance and 30% (21) an additive effect, indicating that all effects contribute to trait variation in japonica-indica rice hybrids. Effects of these QTL were examined to identify Indica rice chromosome segments of interest for the improvement of japonica inbred lines and hybrids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据