4.7 Article

Genetic mapping of the Leptosphaeria maculans avirulence gene corresponding to the LepR1 resistance gene of Brassica napus

期刊

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS
卷 124, 期 3, 页码 505-513

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-011-1724-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSERC from the Government of Canada
  2. Agri-Food Research & Development Initiative (ARDI), Government of Manitoba

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AvrLepR1 of the fungal pathogen Leptosphaeria maculans is the avirulence gene that corresponds to Brassica LepR1, a plant gene controlling dominant, race-specific resistance to this pathogen. An in vitro cross between the virulent L. maculans isolate, 87-41, and the avirulent isolate, 99-56, was performed in order to map the AvrLepR1 gene. The disease reactions of the 94 of the resulting F-1 progenies were tested on the canola line ddm-12-6s-1, which carries LepR1. There were 44 avirulent progenies and 50 virulent progenies suggesting a 1:1 segregation ratio and that the avirulence of 99-56 on ddm-12-6s-1 is controlled by a single gene. Tetrad analysis also indicated a 1:1 segregation ratio. The AvrLepR1 gene was positioned on a genetic map of L. maculans relative to 259 sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers, two cloned avirulence genes (AvrLm1 and AvrLm4-7) and the mating type locus (MAT1). The genetic map consisted of 36 linkage groups, ranging in size from 13.1 to 163.7 cM, and spanned a total of 2,076.4 cM. The AvrLepR1 locus was mapped to linkage group 4, in the 13.1 cM interval flanked by the SRAP markers SBG49-110 and FT161-223. The AvrLm4-7 locus was also positioned on linkage group 4, close to but distinct from the AvrLepR1 locus, in the 5.4 cM interval flanked by FT161-223 and P1314-300. This work will make possible the further characterization and map-based cloning of AvrLepR1. A combination of genetic mapping and pathogenicity tests demonstrated that AvrLepR1 is different from each of the L. maculans avirulence genes that have been characterized previously.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据