4.5 Article

Spatial and temporal analysis of drought using entropy-based standardized precipitation index: a case study in Poyang Lake basin, China

期刊

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY
卷 122, 期 3-4, 页码 543-556

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-014-1312-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51190094]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drought is a frequent and worldwide disaster causing huge losses in agriculture and damages in natural ecosystems every year. Precise assessment and prediction of droughts are important for regional water resources planning and management. An alternative distribution, based on the entropy theory, was used to derive a unified probability distribution function (PDF) for different cumulative precipitation series to calculate the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). Thirteen meteorological stations located within the Poyang Lake basin with daily precipitation records from 1958 to 2011 were selected for spatial and temporal analysis of basin-scale droughts. The entropy-based distribution is proved to be flexible enough for modeling aggregated precipitation at different time scales by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test. Most severely and extremely dry months were recorded in spring and winter in the Poyang Lake basin over the study period. Negative trends of the short-term entropy-based SPIs and corresponding aggregated numbers of rainy days in spring and autumn are detected based on the Mann-Kendall test, which implies an upgrade in difficulties to mitigate the agricultural droughts in the Poyang Lake basin. Once droughts occurred, regions with less frequent drought would face severer drought degree. The lower Ganjiang River, lower and middle Fuhe River, as well as the Xinjiang River are identified to be the most vulnerable regions with highest drought intensities. Droughts could occur at any periods and move from region to region in the Poyang Lake basin; thus, well preparation for potential droughts is needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据