4.5 Article

Frictional properties of cotton-Tencel yarns spun in different spinning systems

期刊

TEXTILE RESEARCH JOURNAL
卷 82, 期 8, 页码 755-765

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0040517511429610

关键词

Yarn friction; yarn-to-yarn; yarn-to-metal; yarn-to-ceramic; spinning; fibre

资金

  1. Dokuz Eylul University, TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) [2211]
  2. Dokuz Eylul University [2008.KB.FEN.022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, frictional properties of Ne 30 yarns produced systematically in different spinning systems (ring, compact and vortex, alpha(e) = 3.7), with different raw materials (100% cotton, 50/50 cotton-Tencel blended and 100% Tencel) and with different twist factors (only for ring yarns alpha(e) = 3.4, 3.7, 4.0), have been investigated. The effect of yarn structural properties (raw material, spinning system and twist level) and test parameters (friction surface and input tension) on yarn frictional properties were evaluated. When the effect of raw material on test results was examined, it was observed that yarn-to-yarn friction (YY) decreases, while yarn-to-metal (YM) and yarn-to-ceramic (YC) friction increases with the increasing ratio of the Tencel in the blended yarn. The effect of spinning systems on test results indicates that friction coefficients of ring and compact were similar to each other for the same raw material, while the friction coefficient of vortex yarns was different. The friction coefficients of vortex yarns were the lowest for YY friction tests and the highest for YM and YC tests. In general, it was determined that the friction coefficient of spun yarns decreases by increasing input tensions. Mainly, it has been stated that yarn structural properties and test parameters examined in this study affect the yarn friction coefficient of spun yarns and especially, it is concluded that frictional behaviour of Tencel yarns are different from those of the yarns used in the study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据