4.5 Article

The effect of humidity and temperature on Wool ComfortMeter assessment of single jersey wool fabrics

期刊

TEXTILE RESEARCH JOURNAL
卷 83, 期 1, 页码 83-89

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0040517512441988

关键词

next to skin comfort; prickle; wool; humidity; temperature; Young's modulus; fibre diameter; regain

资金

  1. CRC for Sheep Industry Innovation Ltd [2.1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Wool ComfortMeter provides an objective measurement of the fabric-evoked prickle discomfort rating provided by wearers. This work aimed to quantify the sensitivity of the Wool ComfortMeter over a range of different temperature and humidity conditions to determine the recommended test conditions for its operation. The design was: three temperatures (notionally 20, 25 and 30 degrees C) at three relative humidities (RHs, notionally 50, 65 and 80%) each with two replicates, using six different wool single jersey knits (mean fibre diameter 19.5-27.0 mu m). As it was difficult to achieve exactly some of the extreme combinations of temperature and RH, some combinations were repeated, providing a total of 23 different assessment conditions. Data were analysed using restricted maximum likelihood mixed model analysis. The best fixed model included RH, RH2, temperature and the interaction of temperature and RH, accounting for 95% of the variation in Wool ComfortMeter readings. Wool ComfortMeter values were almost constant at 55-60% RH. Generally, the Wool ComfortMeter value reduced with increasing RH> 60% at temperatures of 25 degrees C and 28.5 degrees C as the regain of the fabric increased. However, at 20 degrees C little change was detected as RH was increased from 50 to 80% as there were only small changes in fabric regain. The observed effects were in a good agreement with existing knowledge on the effect of regain on the mechanical properties of wool fibre. Wool ComfortMeter is best operated under standard conditions for textile testing of 65% RH and 20 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据