4.4 Article

Structural and stereochemical investigations into bromotyrosine-derived metabolites from southern Australian marine sponges, Pseudoceratina spp.

期刊

TETRAHEDRON
卷 68, 期 47, 页码 9802-9807

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2012.09.008

关键词

Bromotyrosine; Aplysamine; Purealin; Pseudoceratina; Antibacterial; Stereochemistry

资金

  1. University of Queensland for an international postgraduate award
  2. Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland
  3. Australian Research Council [LP0989954]
  4. Australian Research Council [LP0989954] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemical investigation of a southern Australian sponge, Pseudoceratina sp., resulted in the isolation of twelve bromotyrosine-derived alkaloids, comprising four new metabolites, aplysamine-7 (1), (-)-purealin B (2), purealin C (3) and purealin D (4); two new spiroisoxazole enantiomers, (-)-purealidin R (5) and (-)-aerophobin-2 (6); five known metabolites (-)-pseudoceratinine A (7), (-)-aeroplysinin-1 (8), aplysamine-2 (9), purpuramine G (10) and purpuramine J (11): and an artifact 12 derived from ethanolysis of 5. Structures for 1-12 were assigned on the basis of detailed spectroscopic analysis. A second southern Australian Pseudoceratina sp. afforded the first recorded account of a racemic bromotyrosine-derived spiroisoxazole, (+/-)-purealin (13b), together with the known achiral precursor purealidin A (15). A literature review of marine bromotyrosine-derived spiroisoxazoles reaffirmed the published dominance of (+)-spiroisoxazoles, acknowledging several accounts of (-)-spiroisoxazoles, while also revealing a wide range of chiroptical measurements suggestive of variable optical purity. The Pseudoceratina sp. metabolites 1-12, 13b and 15 were assessed for antibiotic properties, with the new metabolites 3 and 13b exhibiting broad spectrum activity against several Gram-positive bacteria. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据