4.4 Article

N,N-Dimethylaniline and 1-(trifluoromethyl)benzene-functionalized tetrakis(ethynyl)pyrenes: synthesis, photophysical, electrochemical and computational studies

期刊

TETRAHEDRON
卷 68, 期 6, 页码 1704-1711

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2011.12.066

关键词

Tetrakis(phenylethynyl)pyrene; Substitution pattern; Radical stability; DFT calculation

资金

  1. Sookmyung Women's University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have synthesized a series of tetrakis(ethynyl)pyrenes functionalized with N,N-dimethyaniline and 1-(trifluoromethyl)benzene as a peripheral electron-donor and electron-acceptor moiety, respectively. In solvatochromic studies, compounds with one peripheral donor and three peripheral acceptors (2), with two donors and two acceptors (3 and 4), with three donors and one acceptor (5) show enhanced charge transfer compared with tetra-donor (6) and tetra-acceptor (1) compounds. The redox peak reversibility depends on the number of peripheral donors and acceptors appended to tetrakis(ethynyl)pyrenes as well as on their substitution pattern as revealed by cyclic voltammetric studies. The photophysical and electrochemical properties of compounds 1-5 have been compared with compound (6) reported recently by J.-W. Oh et al. [Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2522-2524]. The density functional theory (DFT) based calculations such as spin density distribution (SDD) of cation/anion radicals, electrostatic potential (ESP) density distribution, non-adiabatic reduction potentials (NRP) for cation radicals, and vertical detachment energy (VDE) for anion radicals supported the experimental observations. The differences in oxidation peak reversibility for different substitution pattern have been rationalized by calculated static first hyperpolarizability (beta). Our observations would be helpful in designing new ECL-active materials, where ECL (electrogenerated chemiluminescence) efficiency can be improved through improving radical stability. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据