4.3 Article

Telemedicine in Urban and Suburban Childcare and Elementary Schools Lightens Family Burdens

期刊

TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL AND E-HEALTH
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 533-542

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0138

关键词

telemedicine; acute illness; childcare; elementary schools; primary care; low-income population

资金

  1. United States Department of Commerce Technology Opportunities Program
  2. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  3. Rochester Area Community Foundation
  4. Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation
  5. United Way of Rochester and Monroe County
  6. Halcyon Hill Foundation
  7. Rochester's Child, Gannett Foundation
  8. Marie C. and Joseph C. Wilson Foundation
  9. Fred and Floy Wilmott Foundation
  10. Weyerhaeuser Company Foundation
  11. Fein-bloom Family Supporting Foundation
  12. Frontier Telecommunications Corporation
  13. Anonymous donors, Volunteers of America Children's Center
  14. Carlson Metro YMCA Children's Center
  15. Wilson Commencement Park
  16. Ibero Child Care
  17. Action for a Better Community Head Start
  18. Lewis Street YMCA Child Care
  19. Bates-Rich Child Care
  20. Kids First Child Care
  21. Miss Rita's Small World
  22. Rochester City School District
  23. East Rochester School District
  24. Diocese of Rochester Catholic Schools, New York State
  25. Maternal and Child Health Bureau [R40 MC03605]
  26. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [R01 HS15165]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Acute illness challenges all families with young children. The Health-e-Access Telemedicine Network in Rochester, NY, has enabled > 7,000 telemedicine visits since 2001 among children in childcare or elementary schools, predominantly from Rochester's inner city. Large reductions in illness-related absence and emergency department use among Health-e-Access participants have occurred. Objective: The study was aimed to assess parent perception of telemedicine as a means to reduce burdens associated with childhood illness. Design/Methods: A total of 800 parents were surveyed before (578) or after (318) a child had at least one Health-e-Access visit. Queries addressed access to healthcare, conflicts between work/school and child's care during illness, and concerns and likes about telemedicine. Perceptions were elicited through open-ended and direct queries. Results: Among all respondents, 16% had high-school education and 25% had a college education. Race/ethnicity of the respondents included black (43.6%), Hispanic (22.9%), white (30.0%), and other (3.5%). All identified a primary care practice as a source for well childcare. Most (58%) had given antipyretics to their child to avoid being called by childcare or elementary school staff about illness. Likert scale interview items addressing quality of care elicited low levels of worry or concern. Worry scores trended lower after experience. Among 532 comments about Health-e-Access elicited through open-ended probes, positive ones (likes) predominated 84.6%). Likes most commonly included convenience/time saved (33.6% of all comments), parent stayed at work (13.5%), drug delivered to child site (7.1%) or called ahead to pharmacy (4.9%), and confidence in care (2.3%). Negative responses (concerns) totaled 15.4% of comments and most commonly included reliability of diagnosis (2.6%), technical problems (1.3%), and preference for in-person care (0.8%). Conclusions: Health-e-Access was well accepted by a substantial, diverse group of parents despite unfamiliarity with this approach to care. Convenience and convenience-related experience dominated perceptions. This model enables service beyond that mandated by payers and beyond that generally provided by medical practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据