4.5 Article

Episodic slow slip events in the Japan subduction zone before the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake

期刊

TECTONOPHYSICS
卷 600, 期 -, 页码 14-26

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.08.022

关键词

Slow slip event; Earthquake triggering; Ocean-bottom pressure; Volumetric strain; The 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake; Subduction zone

资金

  1. MEXT, Japan under the Observation and Research Program for the Prediction of Earthquakes and Volcanic Eruptions
  2. JSPS [20244070]
  3. MEXT through the MEXT project titled Research Concerning Interaction between the Tokai, Tonankai and Nankai Earthquakes [21107007]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22740287, 20244070, 21107003, 21107007] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe two transient slow slip events that occurred before the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. The first transient crustal deformation, which occurred over a period of a week in November 2008, was recorded simultaneously using ocean-bottom pressure gauges and an on-shore volumetric strainmeter; this deformation has been interpreted as being an M6.8 episodic slow slip event. The second had a duration exceeding 1 month and was observed in February 2011, just before the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake; the moment magnitude of this event reached 7.0. The two events preceded interplate earthquakes of magnitudes M6.1 (December 2008) and M7.3 (March 9, 2011), respectively; the latter is the largest foreshock of the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Our findings indicate that these slow slip events induced increases in shear stress, which in turn triggered the interplate earthquakes. The slow slip event source area on the fault is also located within the downdip portion of the huge-coseismic-slip area of the 2011 earthquake. This demonstrates episodic slow slip and seismic behavior occurring on the same portions of the megathrust fault, suggesting that the faults undergo slip in slow slip events can also rupture seismically. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据