4.5 Article

Differential exhumation at eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau, from apatite fission-track thermochronology

期刊

TECTONOPHYSICS
卷 591, 期 -, 页码 98-115

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.11.012

关键词

Apatite fission-track; Steady state; Differential exhumation; Huaying Mts.; Sichuan basin; Late Cenozoic

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB214805]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [41230313, 40930424]
  3. CDUT College of Energy Resources graduate fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New apatite fission-track (AFT) ages from Mesozoic sediments in the Sichuan basin, combined with previous fission-track data, demonstrate differential uplift and exhumation across the basin. Particularly significant change in exhumation (at least similar to 2000 m) was found across the Huaying Mts. Modeled temperature-time histories and the Boomerang plot of AFT dataset across the basin suggest rapid cooling and exhumation events during 120-80 Ma and at 20-10 Ma. They reflect the start of the basin-scale differential uplift and exhumation which effected the eastern growth of Tibetan Plateau. In particular, nested old-age center separated by Huaying Mts. was found in the center-to-northwest part of the Sichuan basin. A simplified one-dimensional, steady-state solution model was developed to calculate the mean exhumation rate, which is 0.05-0.2 mm/yr in most parts of the basin. It suggests a slow exhumation across much of the basin. The regional pattern of AFT age, length and erosion rate supports a progressive change from the nested old-age center towards the southwest. This pattern supports the idea of a prolonged, steady-state uplift and exhumation process across the basin, controlled by cratonic basin structure. The eastern growth of the Tibetan Plateau has exerted a significant effect on the rapid exhumation of the southwestern part of the Sichuan basin, but not on all of the basin during the Late Cenozoic. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.u

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据