4.5 Article

The crustal structure of the Central Mozambique continental margin - Wide-angle seismic, gravity and magnetic study in the Mozambique Channel, Eastern Africa

期刊

TECTONOPHYSICS
卷 599, 期 -, 页码 170-196

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.04.015

关键词

Crustal structure of Central Mozambique continental margin; Continent-ocean-boundary in the Mozambique Channel; Africa-Antarctica Corridor; Wide-angle seismic data; High-velocity-body; Gondwana breakup

资金

  1. BGR
  2. French polar institute (IPEV)
  3. IFREMER
  4. GRICES
  5. IDL
  6. AWI
  7. CGE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The continental margin of Mozambique formed during the initial dispersal of Gondwana about 180 Ma. Due to the lack of deep seismic and dense potential field data, many details of the timing and geometry of the early breakup in this region remained unknown to date. To close this gap, a research project (MoBaMaSis (Mozambique Basin Marine Seismic Survey) with the French research vessel RN Marion Dufresne II was conducted in 2007. This paper presents the results of P-wave, magnetic and 2D-gravity modelling along two parallel seismic refraction profiles between 37 degrees and 41 degrees E, crossing the Mozambique rifted margin. The crust shows the characteristics of normal to slightly thickened oceanic crust. A lower crustal highvelocity-body with P-wave-velocities of 7.0-7.5 km/s is observed along both profiles. Its origin is discussed in the context of upper mantle convection and thermal properties. The existing magnetic anomaly identifications have been extended to older ages. We postulate that the oldest oceanic crust near the Central Mozambique continental margin has been formed around M41n (166 Ma). Closer to the coast a pronounced negative magnetic anomaly exists that we interpret to coincide with the continent-ocean-transition. This implies that the position of the continent-ocean-transition is located significantly closer to the shoreline than proposed before. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据