4.5 Article

Low-grade metamorphism around the down-dip limit of seismogenic subduction zones: Example from an ancient accretionary complex in the Shimanto Belt, Japan

期刊

TECTONOPHYSICS
卷 502, 期 3-4, 页码 383-392

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2011.02.010

关键词

Accretionary prism; Low-grade metamorphism; Mica; Chlorite; X-ray diffraction; Transmission electron microscopy

资金

  1. MEXT [21107005]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22840018, 21540501] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reactions involving clay minerals during low-grade metamorphism at the depth of an ancient accretionary complex in the Shimanto Belt, Kyushu, Japan, were studied by integrated transmission electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction analyses of the bulk rock and clay fraction. The analyzed metasediment (the Kitagawa unit) contain an incipient sub-horizontal slaty cleavage. Illite crystallinity data and mica b dimensions indicate that the conditions of metamorphic deformation were anchizone-epizone grade and intermediate pressure. Cleavage formation was linked to two reactions involving clay minerals: (1) the recrystallization of 1M-dominant matrix mica, inherited from the original sedimentary fabric, into thick, defect-free 2M(1) packets along cleavage planes; and (2) the formation of chlorite from 7 angstrom berthierine. Balanced equations among the clay phases, based on compositional data and their relative abundance, suggest that the decomposition of matrix mica resulted in the formation of paragenetic mica and chlorite along the cleavage planes, without significant elemental outflux. Although a modal increase in phyllosilicates is not indicated by the data, the growth of chlorite and mica along cleavage planes may have a large influence on the rheological properties of a decollement and may be related to the occurrence of the seismic-aseismic transition at similar to 350 degrees C. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据