4.1 Article

Influence of a Plasma Jet on Different Types of Tungsten

期刊

TECHNICAL PHYSICS
卷 59, 期 3, 页码 346-352

出版社

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S1063784214030025

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [11-08-00813-a]
  2. International Atomic Energy Agency [16 939, 16 960]
  3. Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences
  4. Ministry of Science and Education of the Russian Federation [14.518.11.7004, 11.G34.31.0041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of a plasma producing nonstationary thermal loads akin to edge-localized modes in a tokamak on different types of tungsten is investigated. Tungsten is irradiated by a jet of a hydrogen plasma generated in a plasma gun. The plasma density and velocity are on the order of 10(22) m(-3) and 100-200 km/s, respectively, and the irradiation time is 10 mu s. Two plasma flux densities, 0.70 and 0.25 MJ/m(2), are used. Structural modifications in irradiated single-crystal and hot-rolled tungsten samples, as well as in V_MP and ITER_D_2EDZJ4 tungsten powders, are examined. It is found that the plasma generates a regular crack network with a period of about 1 mm on the surface of the single-crystal, hot-rolled, and V_MP powder samples, while the surface of the ITER_D_2EDZJ4 powder is more cracking-resistant. The depth of the molten layer equals 1-3 mu m, and the extension of intense thermal action is 15-20 mu m. The material acquires a distinct regular structure with a typical grain size of less than 1 mu m. X-ray diffraction analysis shows that irradiation changes the crystal lattice parameters because of the melting and crystallization of the surface layer. The examination of the V_MP tungsten powder after cyclic irradiation by a plasma with different energy densities shows that high-energy-density irradiation causes the most significant surface damage, whereas low-energy-density irradiation generates defects that are small in size even if the number of cycles is large.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据