4.3 Review

Position Statement on Active Outdoor Play

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120606475

关键词

physical activity; health promotion; risk taking; safety; injury; playground

资金

  1. Lawson Foundation
  2. Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
  3. KidActive-Healthy Kids, Communities and Outdoors grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Healthy Communities Fund (HCF) Program Stream
  4. ParticipACTION

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A diverse, cross-sectorial group of partners, stakeholders and researchers, collaborated to develop an evidence-informed Position Statement on active outdoor play for children aged 3-12 years. The Position Statement was created in response to practitioner, academic, legal, insurance and public debate, dialogue and disagreement on the relative benefits and harms of active (including risky) outdoor play. The Position Statement development process was informed by two systematic reviews, a critical appraisal of the current literature and existing position statements, engagement of research experts (N = 9) and cross-sectorial individuals/organizations (N = 17), and an extensive stakeholder consultation process (N = 1908). More than 95% of the stakeholders consulted strongly agreed or somewhat agreed with the Position Statement; 14/17 participating individuals/organizations endorsed it; and over 1000 additional individuals and organizations requested their name be listed as a supporter. The final Position Statement on Active Outdoor Play states: Access to active play in nature and outdoorswith its risks is essential for healthy child development. We recommend increasing children's opportunities for self-directed play outdoors in all settingsat home, at school, in child care, the community and nature. The full Position Statement provides context for the statement, evidence supporting it, and a series of recommendations to increase active outdoor play opportunities to promote healthy child development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据