4.7 Article

A novel electrochemiluminescence tetracyclines sensor based on a Ru(bpy)2+3-doped silica nanoparticles/Nafion film modified electrode

期刊

TALANTA
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 26-31

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.04.054

关键词

Electrochemiluminescence; Ru(bpy)(2+)(3) -doped silica; Tetracyclines; Sensor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21305050]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Fujian Province, China [2012Y0052]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation of the Education Department of Fujian [FB2013006]
  4. Scientific Research Foundation of Shangda Li, Jimei Universtiy, China [ZC2013005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel method for the determination of tetracyclines (TCs) using electrochemiluminescence (ECL) based on a Ru(bpy)(2+)(3)-doped silica nanoparticles (RuSiNPs)/Nafion film modified electrode is presented in this paper. The RuSiNPs were prepared by a water-in-oil microemulsion method. The characterization results indicated that the thus-prepared RuSiNPs presented a uniform size of 45 nm and retained the original electrochemical properties of Ru(bpy)(2+)(3). Importantly, the ECL response on RuSiNPs/Nafion film modified electrode was greatly enhanced by TCs. Under the optimum conditions, the ECL intensity versus the concentration of TCs was found to be linear over the range of 1-100 mu mol L-1 for tetracycline (TC), 0.1-100 mu mol L-1 for oxytetracycline (OTC) and 1-100 mu mol L-1 for chlortetracycline (CTC). The detection limits (S/N=3) were 0.23 mu mol L-1 for TC, 0.10 mu mol L-1 for OTC and 0.16 mu mol L-1 for CTC. Moreover, due to the electrostatic interaction between Ru(bpy)(2+)(3) and silica matrix, the leaching of Ru (bpy)(2+)(3) was greatly reduced, therefore, the ECL sensor exhibited excellent repeatability and stability in the detection of TCs. Based on these investigations, the proposed ECL approach was successfully used to analyze the TCs content in drugs. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据