4.7 Article

HPLC determination of serum pteridine pattern as biomarkers

期刊

TALANTA
卷 128, 期 -, 页码 319-326

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2014.04.052

关键词

Pteridines; HPLC; Fluorescence detection; Fused core reverse column; Human serum

资金

  1. Gobierno de Extremadura
  2. European Feder Funds (Consolidation Project of Research Group FQM003) [GR10033]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pteridinic derivatives are important biomolecules considered as biomarkers for several diseases, especially in cancer and infectious pathologies. A new fluorimetric-HPLC method for the analysis of nine pteridines in human serum has been reported. Two analytical columns composed by C18 porous and fused core particles were assayed and the results compared. Fused core particle column allows us adequate separation, in only one run and in 15 min. Acid precipitation step of the proteins and clean-up process with an Isolute ENV+ (hydroxylated polystyrene-divinylbenzene copolymer) cartridge of the serum samples have been optimized. Analytes were determined by fluorimetric detection, exciting at 272 nm and measuring the fluorescence emission at 410 nm for isoxanthopterin, at 465 nm for xanthopterin, and at 445 nm for the analysis of the other pteridines. Detection limits between 0.07 and 0.61 ng mL(-1) were calculated according to Clayton criterium. Intraday precision varied from 1.2 to 5.3 and interday precision between 1.2 and 7.4, both expressed as RSD (%). External standard and standard addition calibrations were compared in the analysis of serum samples. The pteridine amounts in serum (expressed as ng mL(-1) +/- confidence interval) were 3.69 +/- 1.78; 1.35 +/- 0.24; 0.46 +/- 0.14; 0.54 +/- 0.24; 0.84 +/- 0.55; 2.10 +/- 0.51 and 0.23 +/- 0.11 for XAN, NEO, MON, ISO, BIO and 6HMPT, respectively, using the external standard method. Comparable results were obtained by the standard addition method. It is noticeable that 7BIO was not detected in the healthy serum samples analyzed. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据