4.7 Article

A novel enzyme-free amperometric sensor for hydrogen peroxide based on Nafion/exfoliated graphene oxide-Co3O4 nanocomposite

期刊

TALANTA
卷 103, 期 -, 页码 322-329

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.10.063

关键词

Hydrogen peroxide; Nafion/exfoliated graphene oxide-Co3O4 nanocomposite; Cyclic voltammetry and amperometry

资金

  1. Iranian Nanotechnology Initiative
  2. Research Council of Isfahan University of Technology
  3. Centre of Excellence in Sensor and Green Chemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochemical detection of H2O2 was investigated on a Nafion/exfoliated graphene oxide/Co3O4 nanocomposite (Nafion/EGO/CO3O4) coated glassy carbon electrode. The morphological characterization was examined by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The modified electrode showed well defined and stable redox couples signal in both alkaline and natural aqueous solutions with excellent electrocatalytic activity for oxidation of hydrogen peroxide. The response of the modified electrode to H2O2 was examined using amperometry (at 0.76 V vs. Ag/AgCl reference electrode) in a phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.4). The detection limit was 0.3 mu mol L-1 with a linearity of up to four orders of magnitude and a sensitivity of 560 mu A mmol(-1) L cm(-2). The response time of the electrode to achieve 95% of the steady-state current was recorded at 4 s. The ability of the sensor for routine analyses was demonstrated by the detection of H2O2 presents in milk samples with appreciable recovery values. In addition, the Nafion/EGO/Co3O4-GCE showed good selectivity for H2O2 detection in the presence of ascorbic acid, uric acid, and glucose. The attractive analytical performances such as remarkable catalytic activity, good reproducibility, long term stability, and facile preparation method made this novel nanocomposite electrode promising for the development of effective H2O2 sensor. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据