4.7 Article

Molecularly imprinted solid phase microextraction fiber for trace analysis of catecholamines in urine and serum samples by capillary electrophoresis

期刊

TALANTA
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 270-276

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.05.050

关键词

Molecularly imprinted polymer fiber; Capillary electrophoresis; Solid phase miroextraction; Dapamine; Epinephrine; Norepinephrine

资金

  1. Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea [NRF 2010-0029634]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21005010]
  3. Chengdu university of Technology
  4. [NRF 2011-0010155]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A selective and flexible monolithic moleculary imprinted polymer (MIP) fiber was developed in batch for solid phase microextraction (SPME) of catecholamines (CM), i.e., dopamine (DA), epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE), and coupled with capillary electrophoresis (CE) for trace analysis of urine and serum samples. The polymer fiber was synthesized in-situ simply using a flexible capillary as a mold and the polymerization protocols and SPME experimental conditions were examined in detail. The reproducibility of fiber to fiber fabrication (n=5) was in range of 5.9-9.8% for three CAs. The fiber also shows high stability without any deterioration of extraction performance after 30 times use. Under the established optimum conditions, the limits of detection for DA, E, and NE were 7.4, 4.8, and 7.1 nmol L-1, respectively, with the enhancement factor over 100 after MIP-SPME. The specific selectivity to three CAs was discovered with the developed MW fibers compared with non-imprinted polymer (NIP) fiber. Finally, the MIP fibers were successfully applied for selective extraction of CAs in urine and serum samples with the relative recoveries ranging from 85% to 103%. The fabricated MIP-fibers were promising in preparation of biological samples in batch followed by CE-UV detection. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据