4.7 Article

Automated on-line preconcentration of trace aqueous mercury with gold trap focusing for cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry

期刊

TALANTA
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 1040-1045

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.05.055

关键词

Mercury; Cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry; Solid phase preconcentration; Gold trap

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund
  2. Chulalongkorn University [PHD/37/2550]
  3. Thailand National Research University Project of the Office of the Higher Education Commission [FW652I]
  4. National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A fully automated system for the determination of trace mercury in water by cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry (CVAAS) is reported. The system uses preconcentration on a novel sorbent followed by liberation of the mercury and focusing by a gold trap. Mercury ions were extracted from water samples by passage through a solid phase sorbent column containing 2-(3-(2-aminoethylthio)-propylthio)ethanamine modified silica gel. The captured mercury is released by thiourea and then elemental Hg is liberated by sodium borohydride. The vapor phase Hg is recaptured on a gold-plated tungsten filament. This is liberated as a sharp pulse (half-width <2 s) by directly electrically heating the tungsten filament in a dry argon stream. The mercury is measured by CVAAS; no moisture removal is needed. The effects of chloride and selected interfering ions were studied. The sample loading flow rate and argon flow rates for solution purging and filament sweeping were optimized. An overall 50-fold improvement in the limit of detection was observed relative to direct measurement by CVAAS. With a relatively modest multi-user instrument we attained a limit of detection of 35 ng L-1 with 12% RSD at 0.20 mu g L-1 Hg level. The method was successfully applied to accurately determine sub-mu g L-1 level Hg in standard reference water samples. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据