4.7 Article

Determination of benzimidazole residues in animal tissue samples by combination of magnetic solid-phase extraction with capillary zone electrophoresis

期刊

TALANTA
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 335-341

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2011.12.038

关键词

Benzimidazole drugs; Magnetic solid-phase extraction; Fe3O4/SiO2/poly (MM-co-EGDMA); magnetic microspheres; Capillary zone electrophoresis; Field-amplified sample stacking

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91017013, 31070327, 21005057, 20921062]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Benzimidazole drugs (BZDs) comprise a large number of synthetic anthelmintics, which are widely used in food-producing animals for prophylactic and therapeutic purposes. To protect consumers from the risks related to BZDs residues, a simple, rapid, and efficient method for simultaneous determination of ten BZDs in animal tissues samples was developed. This analytical procedure involved extracting samples with magnetic solid-phase extraction (MSPE) using magnetite/silica/poly (methacrylic acid-co-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) (Fe3O4/SiO2/poly (MAA-co-EGDMA)) magnetic microspheres, and determination by capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE). To improve the sensitivity of the method, we employed the electrokinetic injection with field-amplified sample stacking technique (FASS). Berbine solution was used as internal standard to minimize the fluctuation of analytical results. Under the optimized extraction conditions, good linearities were obtained for the ten BZDs with the correlation coefficients (R-2) above 0.9920. The limits of detections (LODs) for ten BZDs were 1.05-10.42 ng/g in swine muscle and 1.06-12.61 ng/g in swine liver, respectively. The intra- and inter-day relative standard deviations (RSDs) of the developed method were less than 13.6%. The recoveries of the ten BZDs for the spiked samples ranged from 81.1% to 105.4% with RSDs less than 9.3%. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据