4.7 Article

Focused microwave-induced combustion for digestion of botanical samples and metals determination by ICP OES and ICP-MS

期刊

TALANTA
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 308-314

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.03.048

关键词

Focused microwave; Microwave-induced combustion; Trace plant analysis; Residual carbon content

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  2. Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia de Bioanalitica/CNPq [573672/2008-3]
  3. Instituto Nacional de Ciencias e Tecnologias Analiticas Avancadas/CNPq [573894/2008-6]
  4. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES)
  5. Fundacao de Amparo Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS)
  6. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2006/59083-9]
  7. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia (FAPESB)
  8. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The advantages and shortcomings of focused microwave-induced combustion (FMIC) for digestion of plant samples were studied. The effects of sample mass, absorbing solution, oxygen gas flow-rate, and time of reflux step on recoveries of major, minor and trace metals were systematically evaluated. Afterwards, Al, Ba, Ca, Co, Cr, Cu, Mg, Mn, Ni, Sr, V. and Zn were determined by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP OES) and by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The main advantages of FMIC when compared to microwave-assisted wet digestion (MAWD) and focused-microwave-assisted wet digestion (FMAWD) are the possibility to digest larger masses of samples (up to 3 g) using shorter heating times and diluted nitric acid solution for absorbing all analytes. Using the selected experimental conditions for FMIC, residual carbon content was lower than 0.7% for all samples and relative standard deviation (RSD) varied from 1.5 to 14.1%. Certified reference materials (NIST 1515 apple leaves and NIST 1547 peach leaves) were used for checking accuracy and determined values for all metals were in agreement with certified values at a 95% confidence level. No statistical difference (ANOVA, 95% of confidence level) was observed for results obtained by FMIC, FMAWD, and MAWD. Limits of detection were lower when using FMIC in the range of 0.02-0.15 mu g g(-1) for ICP OES and 0.001-0.01 mu g g(-1) for ICP-MS, which were about 3 and 6 times lower than the values obtained by FMAWD and MAWD, respectively. It is important to point out that FMIC was a suitable sample preparation method for major, minor and trace metals by both determination techniques (ICP OES and ICP-MS). Additionally, since it allows lower LODs (because up to 3 g of sample can be digested) and diluted acid solutions are used (without any further dilution), the use of ICP-MS is not mandatory. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据