4.7 Article

Imprinted functionalized silica sol-gel for solid-phase extraction of triazolamin

期刊

TALANTA
卷 84, 期 3, 页码 644-650

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2011.01.035

关键词

Surface imprinting; Solid-phase extraction; Triazolam; Metabolite; Urine sample

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20875034]
  2. Science and Technology Plan Projects of Guangdong Province [2008B030303073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A triazolam-imprinted silica microsphere was prepared by combining a surface molecular-imprinting technique with the sol-gel process. The results illustrate that the triazolam-imprinted silica microspheres provided using gamma-aminopropyltriethoxysilane and phenyltrimethoxysilane as monomers exhibited higher selectivity than those provided from gamma-aminopropyltriethoxysilane and methyltriethoxysilane. In addition, the optimum affinity occurred when the molar ratio of gamma-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, phenyltrimethoxysilane, and the template molecule was 4.2:4.7:0.6. Retention factor (k) and imprinting factor (IF) of triazolam on the imprinted and non-imprinted silica microsphere columns were characterized using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with different mobile phases including methanol, acetonitrile, and water solutions. The molecular selectivity of the imprinted silica microspheres was also evaluated for triazolam and its analogue compounds in various mobile phases. The better results indicated that k and IF of triazolam on the imprinted silica microsphere column were 2.1 and 35, respectively, when using methanol/water (1/1, v/v) as the mobile phase. Finally, the imprinted silica was applied as a sorbent in solid-phase extraction (SPE), to selectively extract triazolam and its metabolite, alpha-hydroxytriazolam, from human urine samples. The limits of detection CLOD) for triazolam and alpha-hydroxytriazolam in urine samples were 30 +/- 0.21 ngml(-1) and 33 +/- 0.26 ngmL(-1), respectively. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据