4.7 Article

Use of ionic liquid aggregates of 1-hexadecyl-3-butyl imidazolium bromide in a focused-microwave assisted extraction method followed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet and fluorescence detection to determine the 15+1 EU priority PAHs in toasted cereals (gofios)

期刊

TALANTA
卷 85, 期 2, 页码 1199-1206

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2011.05.048

关键词

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; High-performance liquid chromatography; Fluorescence detection; Ionic liquids; Ionic liquid micelles; Microwave-assisted extraction

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Innovation and Science (MICINN) [CTQ2008-06253/BQU]
  2. Canary Agency for Research and Innovation (ACIISI) [ULL APD-08/01]
  3. National Science Foundation [CHE-0748612]
  4. [SolSubC20081000171]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A focused-microwave assisted extraction method using aggregates of the ionic liquid (IL) 1-hexadecyl-3-butylimidazolium bromide (HDBIm-Br) followed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet (UV) detection and single-channel fluorescence detection (FLD) has been developed for the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in toasted cereals (gofios) of different nature (wheat, barley, rye, and maize corn) from the Canary Islands, Spain. The optimized HPLC-UV-vis/single-channel FLD method takes 40 min for the chromatographic run with limits of detection varying between 0.02 and 4.01 ng mL(-1) for the fluorescent PAHs from the European Union (EU) priority list in foods, and 20.5 ng mL(-1) for the non-fluorescent PAH cyclopenta[c,d]pyrene (CPP). The optimized microwave step presented extractions recoveries ranging from 70.1 to 109% and precision values lower than 12.6% (as relative standard deviation), using an extraction time of 14 min. The extraction method also utilizes low amounts of sample (0.1 g), and low amounts of IL (77 mg), avoiding completely the use of organic solvents. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据