4.7 Article

Improvement of the analysis of the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) of Mediterranean seawater by seeding control

期刊

TALANTA
卷 85, 期 1, 页码 527-532

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2011.04.032

关键词

Adenosine triphosphate; Autochtonous bacteria; Biochemical oxygen demand; Biodegradability; Natural organic matter; Seawater

资金

  1. Spanish Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) is a useful parameter for assessing the biodegradability of dissolved organic matter in water. At the same time, this parameter is used to evaluate the efficiency with which certain processes remove biodegradable natural organic matter (NOM). However, the values of HOD in seawater are very low (around 2 mg O-2 L-1) and the methods used for its analysis are poorly developed. The increasing attention given to seawater desalination in the Mediterranean environment, and related phenomena such as reverse osmosis membrane biofouling, have stimulated interest in seawater BOD close to the Spanish coast. In this study the BUD analysis protocol was refined by introduction of a new step in which a critical quantity of autochthonous microorganisms, measured as adenosine triphosphate, is added. For the samples analyzed, this improvement allowed us to obtain reliable and replicable HOD measurements, standardized with solutions of glucose-glutamic acid and acetate. After 7 days of analysis duration, more than 80% of ultimate BOD is achieved, which in the case of easily biodegradable compounds represents nearly a 60% of the theoretical oxygen demand. BOD7 obtained from the Mediterranean Sea found to be 2.0 +/- 0.3 mg O-2 L-1 but this value decreased with seawater storage time due to the rapid consumption of labile compounds. No significant differences were found between two samples points located on the Spanish coast, since their organic matter content was similar. Finally, the determination of seawater HOD without the use of inoculum may lead to an underestimation of SOD. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据