4.7 Article

Synthesis and characteristic of the Fe3O4@SiO2@Eu(DBM)3•2H2O/SiO2 luminomagnetic microspheres with core-shell structure

期刊

TALANTA
卷 82, 期 2, 页码 450-457

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.04.052

关键词

Fluorescence; Magnetic; Microsphere; Cell imaging; Eu(III) complex; Magnetite

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [20871083]
  2. Department of Education of Jilin Province of China [2008-371]
  3. Innovative Plan Foundation of Changchun Institute of Application Chemistry, CAS, China [CX07QZJC-29]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The core-shell structured luminomagnetic microsphere composed of a Fe3O4 magnetic core and a continuous SiO2 nanoshell doped with Eu(DBM)(3)center dot 2H(2)O fluorescent molecules was fabricated by a modified Stober method combined with a layer-by-layer assembly technique. X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), confocal microscopy, photoluminescence (PL), and superconducting quantum interface device (SQUID) were employed to characterize the Fe3O4@SiO2@Eu(DBM)(3)center dot 2H(2)O/SiO2 microspheres. The experimental results show that the microshpere has a typical diameter of ca. 500 nm consisting of the magnetic core with about 340 nm in diameter and silica shell doped with europium complex with an average thickness of about 80 nm. It possesses magnetism with a saturation magnetization of 25.84 emu/g and negligible coercivity and remanence at room temperature and exhibits strong red emission peak originating from electric-dipole transition D-5(0) -> F-7(2) (611 nm) of Eu3+ ions. The luminomagnetic microspheres can be uptaken by HeLa cells and there is no adverse cell reaction. These results suggest that the luminomagnetic microspheres with magnetic resonance response and fluorescence probe property may be useful in biomedical imaging and diagnostic applications. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据