4.7 Article

Novel colorimetric enzyme immunoassay for the detection of carcinoembryonic antigen

期刊

TALANTA
卷 81, 期 4-5, 页码 1625-1629

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.03.014

关键词

Gold nanoparticles; Magnetic microparticles; Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA); Horseradish peroxidase (HRP); Colorimetric enzyme immunoassay

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2007CB714502, 2007CB936000]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program) of China [2006AA03Z334]
  3. Ministry of Health [2009ZX10004-301, 2009ZX10004-505]
  4. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [0752nm019, 0752nm021, 0852nm00400, 08110700200, 08540705800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We developed a highly sensitive colorimetric enzyme immunoassay for the detection of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). This method employed gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as can lets of anti-CEA antibody labeled with biotin. which served as an affinity tag for streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (streptavidin-HRP) binding Using this strategy, about 12 HRP molecules were coated onto each AuNP Through sandwich-type immunoreaction, the AuNP-anti-CEA-HRP complex was brought into the proximity of magnetic microparticle. As a result. HRP molecules confined at the surface of the sandwich immuno-complexes catalyzed the enzyme substrate and generated an optical signal. The spectrophotometric measurement confirmed effective signal amplification The signals were linearly dependent on CEA concentrations from 005 to 50 ng mL(-1) in a logarithmic plot, with a detection limit of 48 pg mL(-1). Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were <8.5%. The CEA concentrations of serum specimens assayed by the developed immunoassay showed consistent results in comparison with those obtained by a conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay The developed method thus proved its potential use in clinical immunoassay of CEA. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据